Design of zero emission areas (ZEAs) depends on city context, stakeholder requirements, and ambition level.
Defining a winning concept
Laying the foundation
Laying the foundation
Defining a winning concept
Defining a winning concept
Quantifying the model
Quantifying the model
EXPLORE MORE
Different formats for ZEAs exist, ranging from street-focused ZEAs to more holistic concepts covering entire districts. The selection of an adequate format is city and context specific, depends on ambition level and willingness of stakeholders to make bold moves, and can evolve over time from a small-scale pilot to a holistic, district-wide program.
Choose a format
70%
of cities exceed recommended levels of fine particulate air pollution matter released into the atmosphere annually
Over
Single or several inner-city streets. Either complete access restriction or allowance for certain vehicles with toll.
Managed street
Single tolled commuter lane or EV/high-occupancy lanes.
Managed corridor plus mobility enhancement
Multiple coordinated managed lanes along the same congestion corridor.
Managed network
Multiple coordinated managed lanes as an integrated program with stricter policies in the center.
Managed cordon
Comprehensive ZEA concept for large areas which includes not only traffic but also urban redesign.
Managed district
For city examples, see Urbanaccessregulation.eu
Increasing levels of complexity
Private
households
Private
households
Public sector
Public sector
Private sector
Private sector
Private
households
Residents
Private car-reliant residents
Different generations
Underserved neighborhoods
Private households
Commuters¹
Ride-sharing users
Private car users
Transit users
Active mobility users
Private sector
Commercial traffic
Groceries
Logistics
Parcel
Service and craft
Investors
Private investment funds
Local businesses
Restaurants
Local retailers
Tech players
Mobility-as-a-Service
Software-as-a-Service
Mobility platforms
Automotive OEMS and shared/micromobility players
Infrastructure players
Logistics players
Automotive OEMs
Shared/micromobility
Private sector
Public sector
Special purpose traffic
Ambulance
Firefighting
Plumbing
Police
Public transit¹
Bus
Taxi
Train
Microtransit
Subway
Rickshaws
Motorcycle taxi
Regulators
City regulators
Local/national governments
Public institutions
Associations
Academia
NGOs
Interest groups
¹ Including informal mobility networks
Public sector
Involve a wide variety of stakeholders
The design of a ZEA, and even the implementation of single measures, is a complex undertaking. A wide variety of stakeholders have to be taken into consideration in order to ensure equity and fairness for all users of public and private mobility in urban centers. The stakeholders outlined here should be involved in the planning process early on. Sincere attention to and consideration of their needs is the basis for ongoing acceptance and long-term success of measures that aim to influence urban mobility behaviour.
¹ Including informal mobility networks
Residents & commuters
Residents & commuters
Private sector
Private sector
Public sector
Public sector
Regulatory measures
Phase out of all non-EVs
Phase out of all non-EV passenger cars
Speed reduction in inner-city areas
Order to install charging stations in all
(new) buildings
Prominent visuals to encourage ZEA (voluntary)
More public charging stations
Infrastructure measures
Highway/inner-city tolls for all non-EVs
Subsidies for EV charging, parking, lanes, and loading areas
Subsidies for car/ride sharing, micromobility
Subsidies for public transport
Reward system to use mobility alternatives
Incentivisation measures
Replacement of parking spaces with public areas/bike lanes
Dedicated lanes for high-occupancy mobility
Extension of bike and micromobility lanes
Temporary/permanent closure and repurposing of roads and curb space (eg, pedestrian zone, shopping area, park)
Create limited traffic zones (eg, only for public transport, shared mobility)
Urban redesign measures
Residents & commuters
Regulatory measures
Phase out of all non-EVs
Phase out of all non-EV commercial vehicles
Speed reduction in inner-city areas
Order to install charging stations in all (new) buildings
Prominent visuals to encourage ZEA (voluntary)
More public charging stations
Subsidized parcel lockers for delivery
Emissions-optimized route planning as Software-as-a-Service
Infrastructure measures
Highway/inner-city tolls for all non-EVs
Subsidies for EV charging, parking, lanes, and loading areas
Subsidies for and financing for EV fleets
Incentivisation measures
Replacement of parking spaces with public areas/bike lanes
Dedicated EV loading zones
Goods tram for delivery
Temporary/permanent closure and repurposing of roads and curb space (eg, pedestrian zone, shopping area, park)
Create limited traffic zones (eg, only for public transport, shared mobility)
Urban redesign measures
Private sector
Regulatory measures
Phase out of all non-EVs
Speed reduction in inner-city areas
Order to install charging stations in all (new) buildings
High-frequency public EV shuttles
Infrastructure measures
City investment to replace its non-EV fleets
Subsidies for and financing for EV fleets
Incentivisation measures
Temporary/permanent closure and repurposing of roads and curb space (eg, pedestrian zone, shopping area, park)
Create limited traffic zones (eg, only for public transport, shared mobility)
Urban redesign measures
Public sector
Prioritize measures to reduce emissions
We have developed a number of measures that can help to drive the shift towards sustainable urban mobility with low to no (local) CO₂ and other emissions. The measures can be grouped along two different axes: the sector they aim to address and type of measures they are. In terms of sectors, measures can influence residents and commuters, the private sector, the public sector, or a combination of all sectors. These measures can be classified as regulatory, incentivization, infrastructure changes, or urban redesign approaches. Click on the respective sector on the right to see available measures.
See the expanded grid in the full report.
Stay ahead of challenges
Addressing legal, financial, and technological challenges can only be done through a multistakeholder systems approach.
Legal and political challenges
Financial challenges
Other challenges
Technological challenges
Other challenges
Scale-up of innovative formats
For example, urban consolidation centers, multimodal hubs.
Time and funds
Required for implementation and sustaining the change.
Community buy-in
For example, local and regional public acceptance and support.
Technological challenges
Sensors and street cameras at scale For example, standard solutions to ensure critical mass for occupancy control, congestion charging, and real-time curb management.
Open-source data and data platforms
For example, detailed data on traffic flow, volume for effective traffic modeling and simulation.
Convenient apps and platforms for users
Currently there are many different multimodal and micromobility apps and offerings, each with their own ticketing system.
Technological advancement
Some technological solutions might not yet be available or financially viable.
Financial challenges
Comprehensive business case
Quantifying costs and benefits for a wide range of stakeholders, including residents, local retail, etc.
Cross-subsidizing success cases
For example, revenues from road charging re-invested in EV infrastructure.
Transition financing
For example, large-scale investments in EV infrastructure to accelerate transition to emission-free transport.
City budget for comprehensive ZEA implementation
For example, trade-off between significant investments in street/ZEA redesign in the short-term versus incremental improvements in infrastructure over the years.
Legal and political challenges
Political acceptance
Acceptance can vary significantly depending on the cost and benefits to different stakeholders.
Political willingness
The willingness for bold decision making is often limited regarding regulatory interventions and street redesign due to fears of public reactions and future electability.
Bureaucratic approach and slow decision making
Often ambitious projects get stuck in “business as usual” political processes/mindsets, particularly when adapting a legal framework is required.
Regulatory concerns
Regulations addressing data standards and privacy concerns for sensors and cameras, enabling occupancy control and street charging.
Laying the foundation
Laying the foundation
Defining a winning concept
Defining a winning concept
Quantifying the model
Quantifying the model
EXPLORE MORE